netdev - Re: [RFC] Handle error writing UINT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <363ac4f6f7e1a8b905af567667a1559a@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:30:46 -0600
From:	subashab@...eaurora.org
To:	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Handle error writing UINT_MAX to u32 fields

> The suggested change would extend the usable range of positive numbers
> by one bit only. As many systems are 64 bit this does not seem forward
> looking.
> 
> I would prefer to have a routine that can handle 64 bit integers with
> limits (let's call it proc_doint64vec_minmax) which uses fields extra1
> and extra2 of ctl_table as min and max.
> 
> Then set xfrm_table[].extra1 = 0 and xfrm_table[].extra2 = UINT_MAX if
> you need a result in the u32 range.
> 

Thanks Heinrich. Do you think we can use proc_doulongvec_minmax for 
this?