netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160614184236.GB8518@lunn.ch>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:42:36 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@...well.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:16:02AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> If the interrupt configuration isn't set and we are using the
> internal phy, then we need to poll the phy to reliably detect
> phy state changes.

Hi Jeremy

Why does the external phy not have the exact same problem?

    Andrew