[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b8c79f9-f938-8357-fb6a-af49ada03fda@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:49:20 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: steve.glendinning@...well.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL
On 06/14/2016 10:27 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> If the interrupt configuration isn't set and we are using the
>>> internal phy, then we need to poll the phy to reliably detect
>>> phy state changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
>>> index 8af2556..369dc7d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
>>> @@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ static int smsc911x_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if ((!phydev->irq) && (!pdata->using_extphy))
>>
>> Inner parens aren't needed at all.
>
> Hm, 'phydev->irq' shouldn't be 0 in the first place. It seems to me we
> should correctly initialize 'pdata->phy_irq[]' in smsc911x_mii_init()...
And looking at that array, I doubt it's really useful for anything... And
the memcpy() there seems buggy as well -- it copies just 4 bytes of this array
to 'pdata->mii_bus->irq'. I do care about this driver, so might be a good idea
to clean it up a bit...
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists