netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:26:31 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	steve.glendinning@...well.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: If PHY doesn't have an interrupt then POLL

On 06/15/2016 12:12 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:

>>> If the interrupt configuration isn't set and we are using the
>>
>>     It's never set, judging by the driver code.
>
>     AFAIK, I think that its set when the device is configured as a platform
> device, or there is an external phy/interrupt setup in DT. I might be wrong on
> that..

    I totally fail to see that, even in net-next. The only place that uses 
'phy_irq' is that buggy memcpy()...

MBR, Sergei