netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 06/12] ndisc: add __ndisc_fill_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57617086.8090208@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:13:10 +0200
From:	Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>
To:	Alexander Aring <aar@...gutronix.de>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kernel@...gutronix.de, marcel@...tmann.org,
	jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	mcr@...delman.ca, werner@...esberger.net,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 06/12] ndisc: add __ndisc_fill_addr_option
 function

Hello.

On 14/06/16 13:52, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch adds __ndisc_fill_addr_option as low-level function for
> ndisc_fill_addr_option which doesn't depend on net_device parameter.
>
> Cc: David S. Miller<davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov<kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
> Cc: James Morris<jmorris@...ei.org>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy<kaber@...sh.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring<aar@...gutronix.de>
> ---
>   net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> index c245895..a7b9468 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> @@ -150,11 +150,10 @@ struct neigh_table nd_tbl = {
>   };
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nd_tbl);
>   
> -static void ndisc_fill_addr_option(struct sk_buff *skb, int type, void *data)
> +static void __ndisc_fill_addr_option(struct sk_buff *skb, int type, void *data,
> +				     int data_len, int pad)
>   {
> -	int pad   = ndisc_addr_option_pad(skb->dev->type);
> -	int data_len = skb->dev->addr_len;
> -	int space = ndisc_opt_addr_space(skb->dev);
> +	int space = __ndisc_opt_addr_space(data_len, pad);
>   	u8 *opt = skb_put(skb, space);
>   
>   	opt[0] = type;
> @@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ static void ndisc_fill_addr_option(struct sk_buff *skb, int type, void *data)
>   		memset(opt, 0, space);
>   }
>   
> +static inline void ndisc_fill_addr_option(struct sk_buff *skb, int type,
> +					  void *data)
> +{
> +	__ndisc_fill_addr_option(skb, type, data, skb->dev->addr_len,
> +				 ndisc_addr_option_pad(skb->dev->type));
> +}
> +
>   static struct nd_opt_hdr *ndisc_next_option(struct nd_opt_hdr *cur,
>   					    struct nd_opt_hdr *end)
>   {

Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt<stefan@....samsung.com>

regards
Stefan Schmidt