[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UfPFjy7_wuzzfgbPbnyBzZ+grUOnykEbrYSw4=EvhTVFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:19:59 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@...gic.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...gic.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 06/17] bnxt: Move GENEVE support from
hard-coded port to using port notifier
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com> wrote:
> The port number for GENEVE is hard coded into the bnxt driver. This is the
> kind of thing we want to avoid going forward. For now I will integrate
> this back into the port notifier so that we can change the GENEVE port
> number if we need to in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
So it turns out this patch doesn't apply on top of the current tree.
I will submit a v3 of these patches tomorrow after everyone has had a
chance to review.
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists