netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5761422F.3010303@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:55:27 -0400
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring

On 16-06-15 07:52 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 16-06-15 04:38 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less
>> efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer

> 
> So this is more exercising the skb array improvements. For tun
> it would be useful to see general performance numbers on user/kernel
> crossing (i.e tun read/write).
> If you have the cycles can you run such tests?
> 

Ignore my message - you are running pktgen from a VM towards the host.
So the numbers you posted are what i was interested in.
Thanks for the good work.

cheers,
jamal