[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466097006.17117.7.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:10:06 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: "venkateshs@...gle.com" <venkateshs@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "hannes@...hat.com" <hannes@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: napi_poll must return the work done
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 09:34 -0700, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the function ixgbe_poll() returns 0 when it clean
> > completely
> > the rx rings, but this foul budget accounting in core code.
> > Fix this returning the actual work done, capped to weight - 1,
> > since
> > the core doesn't allow to return the full budget when the driver
> > modifies
> > the napi status
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > index 088c47c..8bebd86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > @@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ int ixgbe_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int
> > budget)
> > if (!test_bit(__IXGBE_DOWN, &adapter->state))
> > ixgbe_irq_enable_queues(adapter, BIT_ULL(q_vector-
> > >v_idx));
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
>
> The same bit of code appears in fm10k and i40e/i40evf. ixgb appears
> to
> correctly return work_done.
>
> ixgbe_poll also appears to return an (minor) incorrect work_done in
> another case, BTW. It divides its
> budget between Rx rings associated with a vector. If any ring exceeds
> its share of the budget, ixgbe_poll
> claims to have consumed the full budget, even if a full budget of
> frames was not received in a single
> pass.
>
> -- vs;
I can submit a patch for fm10k.
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists