[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160615.222050.2210130284846212716.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: john@...ozen.org
Cc: nbd@....name, keyhaede@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and
grouping
From: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:58:46 +0200
> This series contains 2 small code cleanups that are leftovers from the
> MIPS support. There is also a small fix that adds proper locking to the
> code accessing the IRQ registers. Without this fix we saw deadlocks caused
> by the last patch of the series, which adds IRQ grouping. The grouping
> feature allows us to use different IRQs for TX and RX. By doing so we can
> use affinity to let the SoC handle the IRQs on different cores.
This patch series doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree, I get rejects
on patch #4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists