[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160617154042.GB5408@leon.nu>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:40:42 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>, Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is
available
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:02:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, June 17, 2016 5:50:14 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions
> > > in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch
> > > that introduces a problem gets added.
> > >
> >
> > The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it
> > makes some unwanted noise
> > so we will remove it until we figure it out.
>
> I think you can simply ask Fengguang Wu to add your git tree to the list
> of trees he pulls from for the 0-day test bot.
It is not 0-day only, but linux-next too. It works flawlessly for RDMA
topics and Doug receives cleaned and fully tested patches. Sadly enough,
it didn't work well for mlx5 net part.
Till further notice, I removed mlx5 net part (submission queue) from my
tree and from linux-next.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists