[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160616.172048.1390765203474702977.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nogahf@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
eladr@...lanox.com, yotamg@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
linville@...driver.com, tgraf@...g.ch, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
sfeldma@...il.com, sd@...asysnail.net, eranbe@...lanox.com,
ast@...mgrid.com, edumazet@...gle.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 3/4] net: core: add SW stats to if_stats_msg
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:37:16 +0200
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,11 @@ static int rtnl_phys_switch_id_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void copy_rtnl_link_stats64(void *v, const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *b)
> +{
> + memcpy(v, b, sizeof(*b));
> +}
...
> + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats64_sp = NULL;
> + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *sp;
...
> + copy_rtnl_link_stats64(sp, stats64_sp);
I don't see any reason why copy_rtnl_link_stats64's first argument should be
"void *". Please make it "struct rtnl_link_stats64 *".
In fact just doing a straight memcpy() inline is probably the best, there are
no special typing nor casting requirements here.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists