[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466621021.6850.71.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:43:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tcp: reduce cpu usage when SO_SNDBUF is
set
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:18 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>
>
> For 1/2, the getting the correct memory barrier, should I re-submit
> that as a separate patch?
Are you sure a full memory barrier (smp_mb() is needed ?
Maybe smp_wmb() would be enough ?
(And smp_rmb() in tcp_poll() ?)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists