netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0dff6f22-3e43-f658-65ee-1c429823cc1f@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:06:01 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP - part I

On 6/21/16 9:42 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
> Yes TOU may lower the bar for random hacks by Joe Random. But I'd argue
> no large organization would serious consider or dare deploy TCP stack
> with random hacks.

There are userspace network stacks that have been around for years and 
widely deployed on devices that basically use Linux as the boot OS.