netdev - Re: [PATCH] mellanox: mlx5: Use logging functions to reduce text ~10k/5%

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG-EvhZXZRQNJojUvmR_9KPTsq+pEtsjxhpnTtZ3aho+0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:12:23 +0300
From:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Cc:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mellanox: mlx5: Use logging functions to reduce text ~10k/5%

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> The logging macros create a bit of duplicated code/text.
>>
>> Use specialized functions to reduce the duplication.
>>
>> (defconfig/x86-64)
>> $ size drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/built-in.o*
>>    text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>  178634          2059      16  180709   2c1e5 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/built-in.o.new
>>  188679          2059      16  190754   2e922 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/built-in.o.old
>>
>> The output changes now do not include line #,
>> but do include the function offset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> As far as I see all these functions are used in error paths, so no
> implication on performance is expected.
>
> And I'm fine with function offsets.
>
> Saeed,
> What do you think?

Fine with me, need to fix my comment on functions placement, an your
comment on checkpatch.