[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466680680.11061.2.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:18:00 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Yaniv Machani <yanivma@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Guy Mishol <guym@...com>,
Eliad Peller <eliad@...ery.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: time sync : add support for 64 bit clock
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 14:12 +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> Changed the configuration to support 64bit instead of 32bit
> this in order to offload the driver from handling a wraparound.
[...]
Since you Cc'ed me, and presumably want me to review it, I'll say that
this looks like a terrible idea:
> @@ -74,10 +74,16 @@ struct wl18xx_event_mailbox {
This struct is evidently used for firmware/host communication.
> __le16 bss_loss_bitmap;
>
> /* bitmap of stations (by HLID) which exceeded max tx
> retries */
> - __le32 tx_retry_exceeded_bitmap;
> + __le16 tx_retry_exceeded_bitmap;
> +
> + /* time sync high msb*/
> + u16 time_sync_tsf_high_msb;
So first of all, just using u16 instead of __le16 seems wrong.
Additionally, this looks like it changes the firmware API, so that
older firmware images will no longer work?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists