[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY2PR0501MB2056DD2972A874DEC66728ECDA2E0@BY2PR0501MB2056.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:09:18 +0000
From: "Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vmw_vsock sk_ack_backlog double decrement bug
Hi Stefan,
Good catch. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll take care of fixing and testing this.
Thanks,
Jørgen
________________________________________
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Jorgen S. Hansen
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: vmw_vsock sk_ack_backlog double decrement bug
Hi Jorgen,
virtio-vsock doesn't use vsock_pending_work() but I may have spotted a
problem that affects the VMCI transport. I'm not sending a patch
because I can't test it.
1. During vsock_accept() listener->sk_ack_backlog is decremented.
2. vsock_pending_work() will decrement listener->sk_ack_backlog again if
vsk->rejected.
The result is that sk_ack_backlog can be invalid. It only happens in
the case where the listener socket has an error. Maybe in practice it's
not a problem because the server application will close the listener
socket if there is an error...
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists