[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <074b0f4f-7d76-7f03-79b1-c1b1f0a40303@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:46:02 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 0/6] Add support for vrf keyword
On 6/14/16 2:59 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> Currently the syntax for VRF related commands is rather kludgy and
> inconsistent from one subcommand to another. This set adds support
> for the VRF keyword to the link, address, neigh, and route commands
> to improve the user experience listing data associated with vrfs,
> modifying routes or doing a route lookup.
>
> David Ahern (6):
> ip vrf: Add name_is_vrf
> ip link/addr: Add support for vrf keyword
> ip neigh: Add support for keyword
> ip route: Change type mask to bitmask
> ip vrf: Add ipvrf_get_table
> ip route: Add support for vrf keyword
>
> ip/ip_common.h | 3 ++
> ip/ipaddress.c | 11 ++++++
> ip/iplink.c | 15 ++++++-
> ip/iplink_vrf.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ip/ipneigh.c | 14 ++++++-
> ip/iproute.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++----
> 6 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Stephen: This patchset is marked 'Changes Requested' in patchworks, yet
I have not seen any responses to them. What change was requested?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists