[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576DC9C0.4080102@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:01:04 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP - part I
On 06/24/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Here's Christoph's slides on TFO in the wild which presents a good
> summary of the middlebox problem. There is one significant difference
> in that ECN needs network support whereas TFO didn't. Given that
> experience, I'm doubtful other new features at L4 could ever be
> productively use (like EDO or maybe TCP-ENO).
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-tcpm-13.pdf
Perhaps I am being overly optimistic, but my takeaway from those slides
is Apple were able to come-up with ways to deal with the middleboxes and
so could indeed productively use TCP FastOpen.
"Overall, very good success-rate"
though tempered by
"But... middleboxes were a big issue in some ISPs..."
Though it doesn't get into how big (some connections, many, most, all?)
and how many ISPs.
rick jones
Just an anecdote... Not that I am a "power user" of my iPhone running
9.3.2 (13F69) nor that I know that anything I am using is the Apple
Service stated as using TFO (mostly Safari, Mail and Messages) but if it
is, I cannot say that any troubles under the covers have been noticed by me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists