lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:09:05 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <>
To:	Edward Cree <>,
	Tom Herbert <>
CC:	Alexander Duyck <>,
	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Rick Jones <>,
	Manish Chopra <>,
	David Miller <>,
	netdev <>,
	Ariel Elior <>,
	"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <>,
	Bert Kenward <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/5] qed/qede: Tunnel hardware GRO support

> Fundamentally I believe that robust, responsive hardware LRO is not workable as
> the hardware would have to decide to hold onto packets in the hope of merge
> candidates arriving soon after.  Whereas in the software layer (GRO,
> bundling...), the packets are already coming in bursts thanks to the way napi
> polling behaves.

Sounds like an additional coalescing configuration to me [assuming HW supports it].

Powered by blists - more mailing lists