lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160628124241.GA17940@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:42:41 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>
Cc:	luto@...capital.net, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doing crypto in small stack buffers (bluetooth vs vmalloc-stack
 crash, etc)

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:37:43AM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Just a note, crypto/cts.c also does a lot of sg_set_buf() in stack buffers.
> 
> I have a local patch (appended, if anyone wants) to reduce the wasteful
> amount of buffer space it uses (from 7 to 3 blocks on encrypt, from
> 6 to 3 blocks on decrypt), but it would take some rework to convert to
> crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() or avoid stack buffers entirely.

I'm currently working on cts and I'm removing the stack usage
altogether by having it operate on the src/dst SG lists only.

It's part of the skcipher conversion though so it'll have to go
through the crypto tree.

BTW, the only cts user in our tree appears to be implementing
CTS all over again and is only calling the crypto API cts for
the last two blocks.  Someone should fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ