lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4d5a2616-d5cb-ad3f-e346-a24acc6879aa@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:59:04 -0600 From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> To: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@...cade.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, Julien Floret <julien.floret@...nd.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH v3 0/6] Big C99 style initializer rework On 6/28/16 11:58 AM, Phil Sutter wrote: >> since .ifr_qlen is already referenced in that function seems like your >> suggestion above (struct ifreq ifr = { .ifr_qlen = 0 };) should be >> acceptable. > > You mean regarding compatibility of using that define? Or are you > concerned with gcc creating suboptimal code? no, I was thinking in terms of open coding knowledge of a struct. > I'd rather use a more generic approach than the above. Retrospectively, > I'd rather have that brace orgy instead of the above since it's > intention is more clear and it can be dropped once either gcc guys > manage to backport their fix or the last distribution has updated it's > compiler. ha, that's funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists