netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next] tcp: increase size at which tcp_bound_to_half_wnd bounds to > TCP_MSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CS1PR84MB02950F38FF1801E89612B9E4FD220@CS1PR84MB0295.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:54:46 +0000
From:	"Seymour, Shane M" <shane.seymour@....com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] tcp: increase size at which
 tcp_bound_to_half_wnd bounds to > TCP_MSS_DEFAULT

> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
> Trying to cope with ridiculous windows these days is really a waste of
> time, as we perform this check for all tcp sendmsg() calls :(

I don't disagree with you but unfortunately there are still devices
out there like this and probably will be for a long time.

> Anyway, your patch is reversed.

I'm not sure what you mean by reversed, I didn't change the direction
of the test in the code just what it's being compared against and so
it's greater than not greater than or equal to.

Unless auto-correction changed reviewed to reversed?