lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5773E503.3070404@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:10:59 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
	shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
	cov@...eaurora.org, gavidov@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	andrew@...n.ch, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mlangsdo@...hat.com,
	jcm@...hat.com, agross@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v6] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> That's also not how it works: each device starts out with a 32-bit mask,
> because that's what historically all PCI devices can do. If a device
> is 64-bit DMA capable, it can extend the mask by passing DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> (or whatever it can support), and the platform code checks if that's
> possible.

So if it's not possible, then dma_set_mask returns an error, and the 
driver should try a smaller mask?  Doesn't that mean that every driver 
for a 64-bit device should do this:

	for (i = 64; i >=32; i--) {
		ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(i));
		if (!ret)
			break;
	}

	if (ret)
		return ret;

Sure, this is overkill, but it seems to me that the driver does not 
really know what mask is actually valid, so it has to find the largest 
mask that works.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ