[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160629191855.GA15982@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:18:55 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Subject: net.git commit 3bb549ae4c51
Hi,
I'm getting ready with the next installment of changes to rds-tcp
for mprds, and I noticed that commit 3bb549ae4c51 ("RDS: TCP:
rds_tcp_accept_one() should transition socket from RESETTING to UP")
has not made its way to net-next. I also noticed that (even though this
is a one-liner), this patch generates a conflict when applied as-is
to net-next.
My planned changes will cause more turbulence around this piece
of code, so they depend on this patch. What is the advised approach
here? Should I just port this patch over to net-next as part
of my patch-set, and make a note about the port, or something else?
--Sowmini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists