lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160629191855.GA15982@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:18:55 -0400
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Subject: net.git commit 3bb549ae4c51

Hi,

I'm getting ready with the next installment of changes to rds-tcp
for mprds, and I noticed that commit 3bb549ae4c51 ("RDS: TCP:
rds_tcp_accept_one() should transition socket from RESETTING to UP")
has not made its way to net-next.  I also noticed that (even though this
is a one-liner), this patch generates a conflict when applied as-is
to net-next.

My planned changes will cause more turbulence around this piece 
of code, so they depend on this patch. What is the advised approach
here? Should I just port this patch over to net-next as part
of my patch-set, and make a note about the port, or something else?

--Sowmini

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ