[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467235982-55437-2-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:32:48 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 01/15] fm10k: don't use BIT() macro where the value isn't a bitmask
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
The FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD is really just using a bitshift as a power of
2 operation in an efficient manner. We shouldn't represent this as a BIT()
because that obscures the intention of the operation.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
index fcf106e..e98b86b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline u16 fm10k_desc_unused(struct fm10k_ring *ring)
(&(((union fm10k_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i]))
#define FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR 14
-#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD BIT(FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
+#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD (1u << FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
/* Tx Descriptors needed, worst case */
#define TXD_USE_COUNT(S) DIV_ROUND_UP((S), FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists