[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160629.061201.2186992042260603628.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: Platform data for dsa2.c
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:19:28 -0700
> 2016-06-27 18:05 GMT-07:00 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:52:37PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch series adds support for platform data using the new code from
>>> net/dsa/dsa2.c. The motivation behind this is that we have a bit of in tree
>>> platforms (ar7, bcm47xx, x86, others) that could be benefiting from the new
>>> dsa_register_switch() API model but do not support Device Tree, nor is there a
>>> plan to bring Device Tree to these platforms (time vs. benefits).
>>
>> Hi Florian
>>
>> Please could you convert an in tree device to actually use this.
>
> Sure, I don't think there are going to be in tree users who need the
> dsa2_port_link information most of what we have is typically single
> chip, and so in that case, we can even re-use the existing
> dsa_platform_data.
I assume therefore that this series will be resubmitted with an
accompanying example in-tree conversion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists