[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467268522-24589-3-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:35:19 -0400
From: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@...gic.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
<Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: qede_poll refactoring
This patch cleanups qede_poll() routine a bit
and allows qede_poll() to do single iteration to handle
TX completion [As under heavy TX load qede_poll() might
run for indefinite time in the while(1) loop for TX
completion processing and cause CPU stuck].
Signed-off-by: Manish <manish.chopra@...gic.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 77 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
index f476cd0..ab811e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
@@ -1597,56 +1597,49 @@ next_cqe: /* don't consume bd rx buffer */
static int qede_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
- int work_done = 0;
struct qede_fastpath *fp = container_of(napi, struct qede_fastpath,
- napi);
+ napi);
struct qede_dev *edev = fp->edev;
+ int rx_work_done = 0;
+ u8 tc;
- while (1) {
- u8 tc;
-
- for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
- if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
- qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
-
- if (qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq)) {
- work_done += qede_rx_int(fp, budget - work_done);
-
- /* must not complete if we consumed full budget */
- if (work_done >= budget)
- break;
- }
+ for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
+ if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
+ qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
+
+ rx_work_done = qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ?
+ qede_rx_int(fp, budget) : 0;
+ if (rx_work_done < budget) {
+ qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
+ /* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
+ * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
+ * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
+ * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
+ * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
+ * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
+ * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
+ * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
+ * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
+ * will never be another interrupt until there is
+ * another update of the status block, while there
+ * is still unhandled work.
+ */
+ rmb();
/* Fall out from the NAPI loop if needed */
- if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) || qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
- qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
- /* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
- * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
- * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
- * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
- * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
- * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
- * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
- * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
- * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
- * will never be another interrupt until there is
- * another update of the status block, while there
- * is still unhandled work.
- */
- rmb();
-
- if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
- qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
- napi_complete(napi);
- /* Update and reenable interrupts */
- qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
- 1 /*update*/);
- break;
- }
+ if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
+ qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
+ napi_complete(napi);
+
+ /* Update and reenable interrupts */
+ qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
+ 1 /*update*/);
+ } else {
+ rx_work_done = budget;
}
}
- return work_done;
+ return rx_work_done;
}
static irqreturn_t qede_msix_fp_int(int irq, void *fp_cookie)
--
2.7.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists