netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:06:11 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	<luto@...nel.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call_chain().

On 2016/6/28 14:27, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 08:22 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Follow the stack trace and add another cond_resched() where it is needed
>> then ?
>>
>> Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root
>> user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
>>
>> I did not check if the following is valid (Maybe __fib6_clean_all() is
>> called with some spinlock/rwlock held)
> 
> Well, fib6_run_gc() can call it with
> spin_lock_bh(&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock) so this wont work.
> 
> We need more invasive changes.
> 
> 
> 
Hi Eric:

I debug this problem, and found that the __fib6_clean_all() would not hold the cpu more than 1 second event though there
is a lot of ipv6 address to deal with, but the notifier_chian would call the ipv6 notifier several times and hold the cpu
for a long time, so add cond_resched() in the addrconf_ifdown could solve the problem correctly, I think your first solution
is the good way to fix this bug.

Thanks
Ding