lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S37Gn3SL9XucQ8+9MM78TOyEYQHV6bKyCEgQ+trg4e_Xmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:16:54 -0700
From:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	eric@...it.org, victor@...iniac.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet: Use symmetric hash for PACKET_FANOUT_HASH.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:07 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:52:58 -0700
>
>> Why are symmetric hashes required?
>
> Because they want load balancing, such that one flow only can overrun
> one single socket not all of the ones in the fanout.
>
I'm still missing it. Why is this any different than what we need with
something like SO_REUSEPORT?

> Every single user of AF_PACKET fanout wants this behavior.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ