[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160705134950.GC5230@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:49:50 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@....com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, patches <patches@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drivers: net: phy: Add MDIO driver
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:12:35AM -0700, Iyappan Subramanian wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:10:38PM -0700, Iyappan Subramanian wrote:
> >> +static int xgene_mdio_reset(struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (pdata->mdio_id == XGENE_MDIO_RGMII) {
> >> + if (pdata->dev->of_node) {
> >> + clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
> >> + clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
> >> + clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
> >
> > Hi Iyappan
> >
> > Is that a workaround for a hardware problem? If so, i would suggest
> > adding a comment, to stop people submitting a patch simplifying it.
>
> Hardware expects this clock sequence. I'll add comment as you suggested.
What exactly does the hardware require? Is this a workaround for a bug
in the clock generator? Or a workaround for a bug in the MDIO device?
If it is a clock generator bug, i think the fix should be in the clock
driver. If this is bug in the MDIO device, do you need a sleep in
there, so you actually have the clock ticking/not ticking for a time?
Since these calls can all sleep, you have no idea how long/sort the
clock will be enabled/disabled.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists