[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577BD201.2040202@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:28:01 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155
inet_sock_destruct+0x1c4/0x1dc
Le 05/07/2016 07:50, Mason a écrit :
> On 05/07/2016 15:33, Mason wrote:
>
>> I was testing suspend/resume sequences where the suspend operation
>> fails and returns without having suspended the platform.
>>
>> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
>> [ 90.322264] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
>> [ 90.328758] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
>> [ 90.337092] Double checking all user space processes after OOM killer disable... (elapsed 0.000 seconds)
>> [ 90.346765] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
>> [ 90.355357] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
>> [ 90.364590] PM: suspend of devices complete after 2.068 msecs
>> [ 90.365554] PM: late suspend of devices complete after 0.954 msecs
>> [ 90.366223] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.662 msecs
>> [ 90.366227] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> [ 90.379004] CPU1: shutdown
>> [ 90.412661] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> [ 90.450385] CPU1 is up
>> [ 90.450979] PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 0.584 msecs
>> [ 90.451672] PM: early resume of devices complete after 0.667 msecs
>> [ 90.453149] nb8800 26000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
>> [ 90.453264] PM: resume of devices complete after 1.583 msecs
>> [ 90.508180] Restarting tasks ... done.
>> -sh: echo: write error: Input/output error
>> [ 93.860411] nb8800 26000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
>>
>> (The error message is expected, as my suspend routine returns -EIO
>> on failure.)
>>
>> I left the system to idle at the prompt; then 5 minutes later,
>> the system printed the following trace.
>>
>> [ 400.718491] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 400.723175] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c4/0x1dc
>> [ 400.731582] Modules linked in:
>> [ 400.734689] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.7.0-rc6-00010-gd07031bdc433 #1
>> [ 400.742646] Hardware name: Sigma Tango DT
>> [ 400.746671] Backtrace:
>> [ 400.749141] [<c010b974>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010bb70>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
>> [ 400.756747] r7:60000113 r6:c080ea84 r5:00000000 r4:c080ea84
>> [ 400.762454] [<c010bb58>] (show_stack) from [<c02e9fe4>] (dump_stack+0x80/0x94)
>> [ 400.769722] [<c02e9f64>] (dump_stack) from [<c011bfc8>] (__warn+0xec/0x104)
>> [ 400.776717] r7:00000009 r6:c05e3fbc r5:00000000 r4:00000000
>> [ 400.782417] [<c011bedc>] (__warn) from [<c011c098>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x30)
>> [ 400.790022] r9:dfbdd4e0 r8:0000000a r7:c0801de8 r6:df6f9514 r5:df5df144 r4:df5df040
>> [ 400.797825] [<c011c070>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0463c04>] (inet_sock_destruct+0x1c4/0x1dc)
>> [ 400.806661] [<c0463a40>] (inet_sock_destruct) from [<c03e9c60>] (__sk_destruct+0x28/0xe0)
>> [ 400.814878] r7:c0801de8 r6:df6f9514 r5:df5df040 r4:df5df1ec
>> [ 400.820584] [<c03e9c38>] (__sk_destruct) from [<c016f230>] (rcu_process_callbacks+0x488/0x59c)
>> [ 400.829237] r5:00000000 r4:00000000
>> [ 400.832836] [<c016eda8>] (rcu_process_callbacks) from [<c01207e4>] (__do_softirq+0x138/0x264)
>> [ 400.841402] r10:c08020a0 r9:40000001 r8:00000101 r7:c0800000 r6:c08020a4 r5:00000009
>> [ 400.849285] r4:00000000
>> [ 400.851829] [<c01206ac>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0120c04>] (irq_exit+0xc8/0x104)
>> [ 400.859172] r10:c0801f10 r9:df402400 r8:00000001 r7:00000000 r6:00000013 r5:00000000
>> [ 400.867053] r4:c0735428
>> [ 400.869601] [<c0120b3c>] (irq_exit) from [<c0162610>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x88/0xf4)
>> [ 400.877473] [<c0162588>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c01014ac>] (gic_handle_irq+0x50/0x94)
>> [ 400.885865] r10:dfffcdc0 r9:e0803100 r8:e0802100 r7:c0801f10 r6:e080210c r5:c080277c
>> [ 400.893747] r4:c080eca0 r3:c0801f10
>> [ 400.897342] [<c010145c>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c010c694>] (__irq_svc+0x54/0x90)
>> [ 400.904861] Exception stack(0xc0801f10 to 0xc0801f58)
>> [ 400.909936] 1f00: 00000000 00000000 0000826a c0117c80
>> [ 400.918156] 1f20: c0800000 c08024f8 c0802494 c081e2d6 c05b954c c07268c0 dfffcdc0 c0801f6c
>> [ 400.926376] 1f40: c0801f70 c0801f60 c01086b0 c01086b4 60000013 ffffffff
>> [ 400.933020] r9:c07268c0 r8:c05b954c r7:c0801f44 r6:ffffffff r5:60000013 r4:c01086b4
>> [ 400.940826] [<c0108674>] (arch_cpu_idle) from [<c0155f54>] (default_idle_call+0x28/0x34)
>> [ 400.948960] [<c0155f2c>] (default_idle_call) from [<c0156088>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x128/0x17c)
>> [ 400.957620] [<c0155f60>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c04a3f54>] (rest_init+0x8c/0x90)
>> [ 400.965400] r7:ffffffff r4:00000002
>> [ 400.969005] [<c04a3ec8>] (rest_init) from [<c0700cb4>] (start_kernel+0x310/0x31c)
>> [ 400.976522] r5:c081e4c0 r4:00000001
>> [ 400.980121] [<c07009a4>] (start_kernel) from [<8000807c>] (0x8000807c)
>> [ 400.986716] ---[ end trace f8deb50d1b3d3c7a ]---
>
>
> NB: The warning shows up 310 seconds after the suspend attempt.
>
> I rebooted, tried the same operation, and hit the same warning
> still 310 seconds later:
>
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> [ 25.665905] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> [ 25.672102] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> [ 25.680807] Double checking all user space processes after OOM killer disable... (elapsed 0.000 seconds)
> [ 25.690494] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> [ 25.699118] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> [ 25.707899] PM: suspend of devices complete after 1.639 msecs
> [ 25.708796] PM: late suspend of devices complete after 0.887 msecs
> [ 25.709460] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.657 msecs
> [ 25.709465] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> [ 25.729045] CPU1: shutdown
> [ 25.762704] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> [ 25.800416] CPU1 is up
> [ 25.801024] PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 0.595 msecs
> [ 25.801730] PM: early resume of devices complete after 0.678 msecs
> [ 25.803194] nb8800 26000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
> [ 25.803311] PM: resume of devices complete after 1.571 msecs
> [ 25.858245] Restarting tasks ... done.
> -sh: echo: write error: Input/output error
> [ 29.186902] nb8800 26000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
nb8800.c does not currently show suspend/resume hooks implemented, are
you positive that when you suspend, you properly tear down all HW, stop
transmit queues, etc. and do the opposite upon resumption?
Is your system clocksource also correctly saved/restored, or if you go
through a firmware in-between could it be changing the counter values
and make Linux think that more time as elapsed than it really happened?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists