[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:35:45 +0900
From: Masashi Honma <masashi.honma@...il.com>
To: ccaulfie@...hat.com, teigland@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, paul@...l-moore.com, eparis@...hat.com,
zbr@...emap.net, pshelar@...ira.com, bsingharora@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] netlink: Add allocation flag to netlink_unicast()
At the fs/dlm/netlink.c#dlm_timeout_warn(),
prepare_data allocates buffer with GFP_NOFS
and send_data() sends the buffer.
But send_data() uses GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC inside it.
Should it be replaced by GFP_NOFS ?
Masashi Honma
Powered by blists - more mailing lists