lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:13:22 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] vxlan: remove gro_cell support

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 17:58 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> GRO is now handled entirely by the udp_offload layer and  there is no need
> for trying it again at the device level. We can drop gro_cell usage,
> simplifying the driver a bit, while maintaining the same performance for
> TCP and improving slightly for UDP.
> This basically reverts the commit 58ce31cca1ff ("vxlan: GRO support
> at tunnel layer")

Note that gro_cells provide GRO support after RPS, so this helps when we
must perform TCP checksum computation, if NIC lacks CHECKSUM_COMPLETE

(Say we receive packets all steered to a single RX queue due to RSS hash
being computed on outer header only)

Some people disable GRO on the physical device, but enable GRO on the
tunnels.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ