[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:13:22 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] vxlan: remove gro_cell support
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 17:58 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> GRO is now handled entirely by the udp_offload layer and there is no need
> for trying it again at the device level. We can drop gro_cell usage,
> simplifying the driver a bit, while maintaining the same performance for
> TCP and improving slightly for UDP.
> This basically reverts the commit 58ce31cca1ff ("vxlan: GRO support
> at tunnel layer")
Note that gro_cells provide GRO support after RPS, so this helps when we
must perform TCP checksum computation, if NIC lacks CHECKSUM_COMPLETE
(Say we receive packets all steered to a single RX queue due to RSS hash
being computed on outer header only)
Some people disable GRO on the physical device, but enable GRO on the
tunnels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists