netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: fsl: add GUTS driver for QorIQ platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1467924174.32358.69.camel@buserror.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:42:54 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
Cc:	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@....com>,
	Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: fsl: add GUTS driver for QorIQ platforms

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 2:35:33 AM CEST Yangbo Lu wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Could you reply when you see the email?
> > If your method doesn’t resolve the problem, we still want to use our old
> > patchset.
> > 
> > This guts driver had been discussed about one year and blocked many
> > workaround upstream.
> > So please help to review and comment soon.
> > 
> I don't really see how more discussion is going to help us here. I think
> I've made it pretty clear that I don't want to see another platform
> specific way to read an SoC revision and I've even sent a proof-of-concept
> patch to show how the interface can work, now it's up to you to fit the
> guts hardware into that and send a new patch series.

In which relevant maintainership capacity are you NACKing it?

-Scott