netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] vxlan: remove gro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Jul 2016 18:16:45 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] vxlan: remove gro_cell support

On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 11:55 -0400, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:

> Exactly, thus we are also only touching UDP tunneling protocols at the
> moment. Did you nack the removal of gro_cell support from the udp
> protocols or are you fine with it, given that we won't take away the
> functionality to spread out skb_checksum to mulitple CPUs during GRO for
> other protocols and didn't plan to do so?

I am fine with it, but could you rephrase the changelog, otherwise some
people will think they can copy/paste this to other tunnels ?