netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libxt_hashlimit: Prepare libxt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <577FDCC1.4000509@akamai.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:02:57 -0400
From:	Vishwanath Pai <vpai@...mai.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	"pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
	"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu" <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Cc:	"johunt@...mai.com" <johunt@...mai.com>,
	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"pai.vishwain@...il.com" <pai.vishwain@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libxt_hashlimit: Prepare libxt_hashlimit.c for
 revision 2

On 07/08/2016 12:54 PM, Vishwanath Pai wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 12:37 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> If you think some users would still want 32bit limits, then you should
>> (probably) use a _64 suffix for the new functions.
>>
>> 	David
> 
> I am proposing a new revision for hashlimit that supports a higher rate
> along with a few other changes/fixes (in separate patches). Hence the
> prefix _v2 for the new functions.
> 
> - Vish
> 

I'm sorry _v1 for the old functions, the new functions (for rev2) don't
have a suffix.