netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] udp offload: allow GRO on 0 checksum packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx6S377LtT4tFwRaR1K6=+K9npdqxHW8wLgL4AubN65RwKNjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:03:15 -0500
From:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] udp offload: allow GRO on 0 checksum packets

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> currently, UDP packets with zero checksum are not allowed to
> use udp offload's GRO. This patch admits such packets to
> GRO, if the related socket settings allow it: ipv6 packets
> are not admitted if the sockets don't have the no_check6_rx
> flag set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> index 9c37338..ac783f4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct sk_buff **udp_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct sk_buff *skb,
>         struct sock *sk;
>
>         if (NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->encap_mark ||
> -           (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
> +           (uh->check && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
>              NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum_cnt == 0 &&
>              !NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum_valid))

Paolo,

I think you might be misunderstanding the intent of this conditional.
It is trying to deduce that that the inner TCP checksum has likely
been validated or can be validated without doing  packet checksum
calculation. This is trying to avoid doing host side checksum
calculation in the GRO path and really has little to do with rather
uh->check is zero or not. The assumption was that we shouldn't compute
whole packet checksums in the GRO path because of performance. If this
assumption is no longer valid (i.e. there's good data saying doing
checksums in GRO path is a benefit) then all the checksum parts of
this conditional should be removed.

Tom

>                 goto out;
> @@ -271,6 +271,10 @@ struct sk_buff **udp_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct sk_buff *skb,
>         if (!sk || !udp_sk(sk)->gro_receive)
>                 goto out_unlock;
>
> +       if (!uh->check && skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> +           !udp_sk(sk)->no_check6_rx)
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
>         flush = 0;
>
>         for (p = *head; p; p = p->next) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>