[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708233038.GA2067@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 01:30:38 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 3/3] netfilter: replace list_head with single
linked list
Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org> wrote:
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core
[..]
> +#define nf_entry_dereference(e) \
> + rcu_dereference_protected(e, lockdep_is_held(&nf_hook_mutex))
>
> -static struct list_head *nf_find_hook_list(struct net *net,
> - const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> +static struct nf_hook_entry *nf_find_hook_list(struct net *net,
> + const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> {
> - struct list_head *hook_list = NULL;
> + struct nf_hook_entry *hook_list = NULL;
>
> if (reg->pf != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
> - hook_list = &net->nf.hooks[reg->pf][reg->hooknum];
> + hook_list = rcu_dereference(net->nf.hooks[reg->pf]
> + [reg->hooknum]);
> else if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
> if (reg->dev && dev_net(reg->dev) == net)
> - hook_list = ®->dev->nf_hooks_ingress;
> + hook_list =
> + rcu_dereference(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress);
Both of these should use nf_entry_dereference() to avoid the lockdep
splat reported by kbuild robot:
net/netfilter/core.c:75 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
2 locks held by swapper/1:
#0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81c2e567>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
#1: (nf_hook_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81c58fcb>] nf_register_net_hook+0xcb/0x240
Powered by blists - more mailing lists