netdev - Re: [RFC 5/7] net: Add allocation flag to rtnl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <577F1AD7.8040800@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:15:35 +0900
From:	Masashi Honma <masashi.honma@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
	pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
	dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
	hal.rosenstock@...il.com, paul@...l-moore.com, eparis@...hat.com,
	zbr@...emap.net, pshelar@...ira.com, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
	teigland@...hat.com, bsingharora@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/7] net: Add allocation flag to rtnl_unicast()

On 2016年07月08日 11:56, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Managing to mix GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL almost randomly as you did in
> this patch is definitely not good.
>
> Further more, RTNL is a mutex, held in control path, designed to allow
> schedules and waiting for memory under pressure.
>
> We do not want to encourage GFP_ATOMIC usage in control path.
>
> Your patch series gives the wrong signal to developers.
>
>
>

Thanks for comment.

I have selected GFP flags based on existing code.

I have selected GFP_ATOMIC in inet6_netconf_get_devconf() because
skb was allocated with GFP_ATOMIC.

I have used GFP_KERNEL in inet6_rtm_getaddr() by same reason.

 > I will send a patch against net/ipv4/devinet.c so that we remove
 > GFP_ATOMIC usage there.

Thanks. I will modify my patch based on your new code.