lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467985933.17638.54.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:52:13 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] net: sched: convert qdisc linked list to
 hashtable

On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 13:07 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 07/07/16 at 10:36pm, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > index f45929c..630838e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> >  #include <uapi/linux/netdevice.h>
> >  #include <uapi/linux/if_bonding.h>
> >  #include <uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h>
> > +#include <linux/hashtable.h>
> >  
> >  struct netpoll_info;
> >  struct device;
> > @@ -1778,6 +1779,7 @@ struct net_device {
> >  	unsigned int		num_tx_queues;
> >  	unsigned int		real_num_tx_queues;
> >  	struct Qdisc		*qdisc;
> > +	DECLARE_HASHTABLE	(qdisc_hash, 16);
> 
> This blows up net_device to an insane size: 64K * sizeof(struct
> hlist_head). Can we allocate this on demand for net_devices where
> it is actually needed? The majority of virtual devices won't need
> this. Doesn't have to be rhashtable, can still be fixed size but
> at least allocate it.


Jiri probably misread the API and should have used :

DECLARE_HASHTABLE	(qdisc_hash, 4);

Google has a very similar patch with 16 buckets, and it is 'good enough',
although we do not hit the qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog() penalty.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ