netdev - Re: [GIT PULL net-next] rxrpc: Improve conn/call lookup and fix call number generation [ver #3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31924.1468047394@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jul 2016 07:56:34 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL net-next] rxrpc: Improve conn/call lookup and fix call number generation [ver #3]

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> > Can you pull this into net-next please?
> 
> I'll pull, but this is not how I want you to operate.
> 
> If you change stuff, you must repost the entire series.  And this is
> one of many reasons I want people to keep patch sets small, so that
> this is less painful.
> 
> But the whole series repost is absolutely required.
> 
> I don't care if you just add a "." to the end of a sentence, I want to
> see the series reposted for review in it's entirety.

That's why I asked if you'd prefer me to post the whole lot instead.  I
checked the netdev faq, but it doesn't express your preference.

David