netdev - Re: [patch net-next 1/2] devlink: add hardware messages tracing facility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:54:12 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
	yotamg@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com, nogahf@...lanox.com,
	ogerlitz@...lanox.com, ivecera@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 1/2] devlink: add hardware messages tracing
 facility

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:18:47 +0200
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:

> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index c99ffe8..865ade6 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size);
>  int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev);
>  void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink);
>  void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink);
> +void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink, bool incoming,
> +			 unsigned long type, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>  int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
>  			  struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>  			  unsigned int port_index);
> @@ -154,6 +156,12 @@ static inline void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink)
>  	kfree(devlink);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink,
> +				       bool incoming, unsigned long type,
> +				       const u8 *buf, size_t len);
> +{
> +}
> +

I'm assuming the !CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK was never tested, because the
above probably wont build, and if it did, it would be wrong.

-- Steve