netdev - Re: Fwd: Fwd: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net/smc: Shared Memory Communications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:10:36 -0700
From:	Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To:	Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Utz Bacher <utz.bacher@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net/smc: Shared Memory
 Communications - RDMA

On 2016/07/12 11:08, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2016/07/06 17:29, Ursula Braun wrote:
> > Dave,
> > 
> > we still like to see SMC-R included into a future Linux-kernel. After
> > answering your first 2 questions, there is no longer a response. What should
> > we do next?
> > - Still wait for an answer from you?
> > - Resend the same whole SMC-R patch series, this time with the cover letter
> > adapted to your requested changes?
> 
> ^^^ I would suggest to send v2 of the patch series with the changes
> that were requested.
> 
> > - Put the SMC-R development on hold, and concentrate on another
> > s390-specific SMC-solution first (not RDMA-based), that makes use of the
> > SMC-socket family as well.
> > - Anything else?
> > 

... and I would suggest to trim my emails next time. Sorry.