netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf, perf: split bpf_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <efa00eb005d3e7655a2a0251ae3f82533d824821.1468362046.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:36:18 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf, perf: split bpf_perf_event_output

Split the bpf_perf_event_output() helper as a preparation into two
parts. The newly bpf_perf_event_output() will prepare the raw record
itself and test for unknown flags from BPF trace context, where the
__bpf_perf_event_output() does the core work and will be reused later
as well.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 8540bd5..4d3d5b8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -233,25 +233,17 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
 	.arg2_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_perf_event_output(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 flags, u64 r4, u64 size)
+static __always_inline u64
+__bpf_perf_event_output(struct pt_regs *regs, struct bpf_map *map,
+			u64 flags, struct perf_raw_record *raw)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *) (long) r1;
-	struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (long) r2;
 	struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
 	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	u64 index = flags & BPF_F_INDEX_MASK;
-	void *data = (void *) (long) r4;
 	struct perf_sample_data sample_data;
 	struct bpf_event_entry *ee;
 	struct perf_event *event;
-	struct perf_raw_record raw = {
-		.size = size,
-		.size_head = size,
-		.data = data,
-	};
 
-	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INDEX_MASK)))
-		return -EINVAL;
 	if (index == BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU)
 		index = cpu;
 	if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
@@ -270,11 +262,27 @@ static u64 bpf_perf_event_output(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 flags, u64 r4, u64 size)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	perf_sample_data_init(&sample_data, 0, 0);
-	sample_data.raw = &raw;
+	sample_data.raw = raw;
 	perf_event_output(event, &sample_data, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static u64 bpf_perf_event_output(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 flags, u64 r4, u64 size)
+{
+	struct perf_raw_record raw = {
+		.size		= size,
+		.size_head	= size,
+		.data		= (void *)(long) r4,
+	};
+
+	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_INDEX_MASK)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return __bpf_perf_event_output((struct pt_regs *)(long) r1,
+				       (struct bpf_map *)(long) r2,
+				       flags, &raw);
+}
+
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_output_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_perf_event_output,
 	.gpl_only	= true,
-- 
1.9.3