netdev - Re: [patch net-next 1/2] devlink: add hardware messages tracing facility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:47:58 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
	yotamg@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com, nogahf@...lanox.com,
	ogerlitz@...lanox.com, ivecera@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 1/2] devlink: add hardware messages tracing
 facility

Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:54:12PM CEST, rostedt@...dmis.org wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:18:47 +0200
>Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>> index c99ffe8..865ade6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size);
>>  int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev);
>>  void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink);
>>  void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink);
>> +void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink, bool incoming,
>> +			 unsigned long type, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>>  int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
>>  			  struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>>  			  unsigned int port_index);
>> @@ -154,6 +156,12 @@ static inline void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink)
>>  	kfree(devlink);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink,
>> +				       bool incoming, unsigned long type,
>> +				       const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>
>I'm assuming the !CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK was never tested, because the
>above probably wont build, and if it did, it would be wrong.

Will fix.