[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1468339862-4028-7-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 18:11:02 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: conntrack: skip clash resolution if nat is in place
The clash resolution is not easy to apply if the NAT table is
registered. Even if no NAT rules are installed, the nul-binding ensures
that a unique tuple is used, thus, the packet that loses race gets a
different source port number, as described by:
http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=146818011604484&w=2
Clash resolution with NAT is also problematic if addresses/port range
ports are used since the conntrack that wins race may describe a
different mangling that we may have earlier applied to the packet via
nf_nat_setup_info().
Fixes: 71d8c47fc653 ("netfilter: conntrack: introduce clash resolution on insertion race")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 62c42e9..9f530ad 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -646,6 +646,7 @@ static int nf_ct_resolve_clash(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct), nf_ct_protonum(ct));
if (l4proto->allow_clash &&
+ !nfct_nat(ct) &&
!nf_ct_is_dying(ct) &&
atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)) {
nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, (struct nf_conn *)skb->nfct);
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists