[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7teg6w3xpz.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:01:44 -0400
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v2 1/3] netfilter: bridge: add and use br_nf_hook_thresh
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:32:19AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> +/* recursively invokes nf_hook_slow (again), skipping already-called
>> + * hooks (< NF_BR_PRI_BRNF).
>> + *
>> + * Called with rcu read lock held.
>> + */
>> +int br_nf_hook_thresh(unsigned int hook, struct net *net,
>> + struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + struct net_device *indev,
>> + struct net_device *outdev,
>> + int (*okfn)(struct net *, struct sock *,
>> + struct sk_buf *))
> ^^^^^^
>
> This doesn't compile. Please, make sure patches compile independently
> so we make sure git bisectability doesn't break. Thanks.
Okay, I will make sure to do this for all the patches. Apologies.
Thanks for the review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists