[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160716.200248.806604407055802626.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 20:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bjorn@...k.no
Cc: David.Laight@...LAB.COM, kristian.evensen@...il.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rndis_host: Set random MAC for ZTE MF910
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:42:28 +0200
> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> writes:
>> From: Bjørn Mork
>> Not only that, there certainly used to be manufacturers that used 'locally
>> administered' addresses on all their cards (as well as those that used unallocated
>> address blocks).
>
> Sure. But is there any reason to care about those addresses?
And for that case, this patch we are discussing would be a bug fix.
I'm going to apply the "bp[0] & 0x02" patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists