netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 03/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: extract device mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:35:58 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 03/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: extract device
 mapping

> +/* Indirect write to single pointer-data register with an Update bit */
> +static int mv88e6xxx_update_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +				  int addr, int reg, u16 update)

Hi Vivien

I don't think mv88e6xxx_update_read() makes any sense? Can we just
infer write? Call it mv88e6xxx_update().

> +static int mv88e6xxx_g2_device_mapping_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +					     int target, int port)
> +{
> +	u16 val = (target << 8) | (port & 0xf);
> +
> +	return mv88e6xxx_update_write(chip, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_DEVICE_MAPPING,
> +				      val);

This would then all be on one line and look a better.

     Andrew