netdev - [RFC PATCH 08/30] net/netpolicy: set and remove irq affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1468824984-65318-9-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:56:02 -0700
From:	kan.liang@...el.com
To:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, aduyck@...antis.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	decot@...glers.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/30] net/netpolicy: set and remove irq affinity

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

This patches introduces functions to set and remove irq affinity
according to cpu and queue mapping.
The functions will not record the previous affinity status. After a
set/remove cycles, it will set the affinity on all online cpu with irq
balance enabling.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
 net/core/netpolicy.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/netpolicy.c b/net/core/netpolicy.c
index ff7fc04..c44818d 100644
--- a/net/core/netpolicy.c
+++ b/net/core/netpolicy.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -128,6 +129,38 @@ err:
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
+static void netpolicy_clear_affinity(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct netpolicy_sys_info *s_info = &dev->netpolicy->sys_info;
+	u32 i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < s_info->avail_rx_num; i++) {
+		irq_clear_status_flags(s_info->rx[i].irq, IRQ_NO_BALANCING);
+		irq_set_affinity_hint(s_info->rx[i].irq, cpu_online_mask);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < s_info->avail_tx_num; i++) {
+		irq_clear_status_flags(s_info->tx[i].irq, IRQ_NO_BALANCING);
+		irq_set_affinity_hint(s_info->tx[i].irq, cpu_online_mask);
+	}
+}
+
+static void netpolicy_set_affinity(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct netpolicy_sys_info *s_info = &dev->netpolicy->sys_info;
+	u32 i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < s_info->avail_rx_num; i++) {
+		irq_set_status_flags(s_info->rx[i].irq, IRQ_NO_BALANCING);
+		irq_set_affinity_hint(s_info->rx[i].irq, cpumask_of(s_info->rx[i].cpu));
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < s_info->avail_tx_num; i++) {
+		irq_set_status_flags(s_info->tx[i].irq, IRQ_NO_BALANCING);
+		irq_set_affinity_hint(s_info->tx[i].irq, cpumask_of(s_info->tx[i].cpu));
+	}
+}
+
 const char *policy_name[NET_POLICY_MAX] = {
 	"NONE"
 };
-- 
2.5.5